Iranian Political Science Association Research Letter of Political Science 1735790X 13 4 2018 11 22 REPRESENTATION OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF ‘IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL’ IN AMERICAN AND ENGLAND MEDIA; A NARRATIVE ANALYSIS REPRESENTATION OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF ‘IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL’ IN AMERICAN AND ENGLAND MEDIA; A NARRATIVE ANALYSIS 159 192 362 FA Marzieh Hajipour Sarduie Newswoman/IRIB Farahnaz Mostafavi Kohnegi Assistant Professor/Payam Nour University Faezeh Taghipour Assistant Professor, Management Group, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University Journal Article 2018 10 18 This article applies a method of narrative analysis to investigate the discursive contestation over the ‘Iran nuclear deal’ in American and England media. In fact, the goal of this review is to recognize narrative elements constituting the deal as a US foreign policy success or failure. The article argues that foreign policy successes and failures are socially constructed through narratives and suggests how narrative analysis as a discourse analytical method can be employed to trace discursive contests about such constructions. Based on insights from literary studies and narratology, it shows that stories of failures and successes follow similar structures but different contents and include a number of key elements, including a particular setting; a negative/positive characterization of individual and collective decision-makers; and an emplotment of success or failure through the attribution of credit/blame and responsibility. The article foregrounds the importance of how stories are told as an explanation for the dominance or marginality of narratives in political discourse. This article applies a method of narrative analysis to investigate the discursive contestation over the ‘Iran nuclear deal’ in American and England media. In fact, the goal of this review is to recognize narrative elements constituting the deal as a US foreign policy success or failure. The article argues that foreign policy successes and failures are socially constructed through narratives and suggests how narrative analysis as a discourse analytical method can be employed to trace discursive contests about such constructions. Based on insights from literary studies and narratology, it shows that stories of failures and successes follow similar structures but different contents and include a number of key elements, including a particular setting; a negative/positive characterization of individual and collective decision-makers; and an emplotment of success or failure through the attribution of credit/blame and responsibility. The article foregrounds the importance of how stories are told as an explanation for the dominance or marginality of narratives in political discourse. http://www.ipsajournal.ir/article_362_c3e878e27f52e2a57ace4d9a76fd9acf.pdf