<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Political Science Association</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research Letter of Political Science</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735790X</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Every Day-Life and Political Conflict in Iran after Islamic Revolution; From 11 February 1979 to 2 June 1981</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Every Day-Life and Political Conflict in Iran after Islamic Revolution; From 11 February 1979 to 2 June 1981</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>97</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>142</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">419</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/ipsa.2020.419</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abolfazl</FirstName>
					<LastName>Delavari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science,  Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kazemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Cultural Studies, Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies, Ministry of Science, Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>After the Islamic Revolution of 1979, the positions of political and revolutionary elites, as well as the masses manifested the immediate transformation of the everyday-life and the construction of the new course of history in the life of Iranian people. So, each position that was taken by the political forces towards politics should encompass the everyday-life. Accordingly, the present article focused on the relationships between everyday-life and political conflict between 11 February and 2 June 1981. To do this, the mixed research method was used. For collecting data, a combination of the first-hand and the second-hand resources was applied. After classifying data, the researchers tried to discover and describe the relationships between the various elements of the research and provide the final interpretation. The findings of the study revealed that after the Revolution and in the post-revolution’s conflicts, everyday-life, that was a great help for the triumph of the Revolution, became the controversial area for imposing political power and conflicting political forces. The area that turn into political unity from political pluralism after two years. The ultimate unity made some quantitative and qualitative increase in the suspected and omitted phenomena in the daily-life of people, simultaneously, it formed the future of Iranian society and guide the relationship between social forces and the construction of the established power.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">After the Islamic Revolution of 1979, the positions of political and revolutionary elites, as well as the masses manifested the immediate transformation of the everyday-life and the construction of the new course of history in the life of Iranian people. So, each position that was taken by the political forces towards politics should encompass the everyday-life. Accordingly, the present article focused on the relationships between everyday-life and political conflict between 11 February and 2 June 1981. To do this, the mixed research method was used. For collecting data, a combination of the first-hand and the second-hand resources was applied. After classifying data, the researchers tried to discover and describe the relationships between the various elements of the research and provide the final interpretation. The findings of the study revealed that after the Revolution and in the post-revolution’s conflicts, everyday-life, that was a great help for the triumph of the Revolution, became the controversial area for imposing political power and conflicting political forces. The area that turn into political unity from political pluralism after two years. The ultimate unity made some quantitative and qualitative increase in the suspected and omitted phenomena in the daily-life of people, simultaneously, it formed the future of Iranian society and guide the relationship between social forces and the construction of the established power.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Everyday-Life</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">political conflict</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Political Pluralism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">lived Experience</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Political Unity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">the Everyday</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://www.ipsajournal.ir/article_419_7eacb532570ff6858afd2723755ff790.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
