نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای جامعه‌شناسی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
2 دانشیار جامعه‌شناسی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
3 دانشیار جامعه‌شناسی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Through an interdisciplinary approach, the narrative analysis of the journalists' collective action on institution-building aims at investigating the absence of journalism institution-building in Iran and scrutinizing the sustainable development of the press from the perspective of “institutional agency.” A review of the role of press syndicates in the institution-building of the development of the press in Iran and consolidation of the media development indices from the prism of the concept of “collective action” constitutes the theoretical approach of the study.
The data required were gathered through the conduction of in-depth narrative interviews with journalists as well as building on textual sources and data available in written forms. For data analysis based on narrative analysis, the thematic model has been used for thematization. The individual analysis unit is the journalist, and the data analysis unit is narrative texture. Drawing on the mixed purposive sampling method, an effort has been made to ensure compatibility sampling to achieve representativeness.
The results signify that in press syndicates, “antagonizing” connections with other power centers are replaced by relationships with the “co-workers” that often eliminate the possibility of a consensus for taking effective steps in developing the unions and furthering impactful collective action, or significantly curtail such possibilities.
the unsustainable development processes of the press, especially in professional collectives lack the “effective connection of the constituents” that hamper the institution-building of the collective action. Identity-oriented and professional resources are not linked to material resources and cannot result in “hegemonic actions” required for solidifying the development discourses.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
