نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشآموخته کارشناسی ارشد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
2 استادیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
3 استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
What choices have we Iranians faced in recent decades, and what were those who presented us with these choices thinking? On one side lies a form of pure idealism—a mental state in which one is ready to sacrifice many things for principles and beliefs. On the opposite side is rationalism, characterized by a science-oriented life and the prioritization of individualism, solidified through modernity, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and the French Revolution. This thesis aims to answer the question: What is the relationship between the discourse of nativism among intellectuals of the Second Pahlavi era and the discourse of anti-Enlightenment? The research hypothesis suggests that the nativist discourse of intellectuals during the Second Pahlavi era, due to its romanticism, anti-rationalism, and emphasis on authenticity, aligns with the broader framework of the anti-Enlightenment discourse and can be correlated with it. This study employs Isaiah Berlin’s concept of “anti-Enlightenment” as its theoretical framework to examine the nativist discourse of intellectuals during the Second Pahlavi era based on its characteristics. It seeks to evaluate Fardid’s thought regarding authenticity, Jalal Al-e Ahmad’s ideas concerning national and ethnic identity, and Shariati’s central discourse of “return to the self” in relation to the main components of the anti-Enlightenment discourse. The research method is descriptive-analytical
کلیدواژهها English
