عنوان مقاله [English]
All constitutions are the results of social situations of the time when the law has been formulated and inevitably they cannot be indifferent to any of their contemporary issues and events. With the advent of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the revolutionary society was in need of a formulated and written text: the Constitution.With the triumph of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, the need for a new Constitution was emerged. The responsibility of drafting of constitution was given to the Assembly of Constitution Experts for finalizing the constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran. The author in this article with totally reference to the debates of the Assembly of Constitution Experts and analyzing the debates,will try to answer the main question:what is the main attitude of Experts of constituent assembly of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran about the issue of ethnicity?In this paper,the author, has elected the 33 members of Assembly of Experts and investigated their attituds about the ethnicity. In order to study the concept of ethnicity in contemporary Iran, it seems necessary to understand the attitude of the members of this Assembly toward the issue of ethnicity in their discussions. My assumption in this paper is that these experts had a five-angle attitude (religious, obvious, rational, revolutionary, and jurisprudential) to the issue of ethnicity and regarded them as insignificant subject of universality of Islam.In this article, the writer, has selected and studied the 36 articles of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran.