Nativism as the Iranian Version of Counter-Enlightenment: The Comparative Analysis of the Identity-Minded Intellectuals` Reaction to the Pahlavi`s Quasi-Modernism

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A in Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Iran

3 Professor of Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Iran

Abstract
What choices have we Iranians faced in recent decades, and what were those who presented us with these choices thinking? On one side lies a form of pure idealism—a mental state in which one is ready to sacrifice many things for principles and beliefs. On the opposite side is rationalism, characterized by a science-oriented life and the prioritization of individualism, solidified through modernity, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and the French Revolution. This thesis aims to answer the question: What is the relationship between the discourse of nativism among intellectuals of the Second Pahlavi era and the discourse of anti-Enlightenment? The research hypothesis suggests that the nativist discourse of intellectuals during the Second Pahlavi era, due to its romanticism, anti-rationalism, and emphasis on authenticity, aligns with the broader framework of the anti-Enlightenment discourse and can be correlated with it. This study employs Isaiah Berlin’s concept of “anti-Enlightenment” as its theoretical framework to examine the nativist discourse of intellectuals during the Second Pahlavi era based on its characteristics. It seeks to evaluate Fardid’s thought regarding authenticity, Jalal Al-e Ahmad’s ideas concerning national and ethnic identity, and Shariati’s central discourse of “return to the self” in relation to the main components of the anti-Enlightenment discourse. The research method is descriptive-analytical

Keywords

Subjects

  • Receive Date 03 May 2026
  • Revise Date 11 July 2026
  • Accept Date 24 July 2026